Gethers v. McDonald et al
| Terry R. Gethers |
| Robert A. McDonald and Carolyn Mahoney |
| 3:2015cv00177 |
| February 10, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| New Haven Office |
| New Haven |
| Vanessa L. Bryant |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
82
ORDER: To the extent Plaintiff's Motion in Limine Countering the Defense Motion in Limine sought reconsideration of the Court's Order granting summary judgment as to Plaintiff's preselection claim [Dkt. 71 at 8], Plaintiff's request for reconsideration is DENIED for the reasons set forth in the Decision attached. Signed by Judge Vanessa L. Bryant on 5/5/2017. (Hudson, C)
|
|
Filing
74
ORDER granting in part and denying in part Defendant's Motion in Limine [Dkt. 69 at 94] for the reasons set forth in the Memorandum of Decision attached. The Court also finds as moot Plaintiff's Motions to Allow all of Plaintiff's Exh ibits 70 and 71 as Plaintiff's Motions are based on Defendant's delay and this Order allows Plaintiff seven days from the date of this Order to respond to certain of Defendant's arguments. Signed by Judge Vanessa L. Bryant on 5/1/2017. (Hudson, C)
|
|
Filing
47
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 33 Motion for Summary Judgment for the reasons set forth in the Memorandum of Decision attached. Signed by Judge Vanessa L. Bryant on 4/5/2017. (Hudson, C)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
