Riddick v. Semple et al
| Jerome Riddick |
| Semple, Falcone, Hein, Dilworth, McDaniels and Calderon |
| 3:2015cv00322 |
| March 4, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| New Haven Office |
| New Haven |
| Stefan R. Underhill |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
137
ORDER denying 101 Motion for Order to Show Cause; denying 101 Motion for TRO; denying 101 Motion for Preliminary Injunction; denying 102 Motion for TRO; denying 102 Motion for Preliminary Injunction; denying without prejudice 103 Moti on to Appoint Counsel; denying as moot 112 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply; denying 119 Motion for Copies; denying 120 Motion for TRO; denying 127 Motion for Default Entry 55(a); denying 130 Emergency Motion to Preserve Evidence; granting 132 Motion for Extension of Time. The claims against Social Worker John Doe 1 and Social Worker John Doe 2 are DISMISSED pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). The Clerk shall terminate Social Worker John Doe 1 and Social Worker John Doe 2 as defendants. Signed by Judge Stefan R Underhill on 2/22/2019 (Pincus, A).
|
|
Filing
125
ORDER: - Granting in part and denying in part 72 Motion to Dismiss; - Denying 90 Motion to Strike; - Denying 90 Motion to Dismiss; - Denying 93 Motion to Strike; - Granting 110 Motion for Extension of Time to Conduct Discovery; - Denying as moot 113 Motion for Leave to File. Signed by Judge Stefan R Underhill on 9/21/18. (Kaas, E.)
|
|
Filing
124
ORDER denying 87 MOTION to Deconsolidate; denying as moot 116 Motion for Clarification; denying 122 SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION re: ECF #87, Motion to Deconsolidate and Reopen the 439 Case. The claims in counts nineteen (19), twenty (20), twenty-o ne (21), twenty-two (22), twenty-three (23), twenty-four (24), twenty-five (25), twenty-six (26), twenty-seven (27), and twenty-eight (28), of the Amended Complaint, Doc. No. 66, filed in this lead case, have been WITHDRAWN by Al-Bukhari and the clai m in count eighteen (18), is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice to Al-Bukhari asserting the claim in an amended complaint filed in Riddick v. Semple, et al., Case No. 3:16-cv-1769 (SRU). The claims in counts five (5), six (6), seven (7), eight (8), and nine (9), of the Amended Complaint, Doc. No. 66, filed in this lead case, are hereby DISMISSED without prejudice to Al-Bukhari asserting those claims in an amended complaint filed in Al-Bukhari v. Correction, et al., Case No. 3:16-cv-1267 (SRU); denying as moot 116 Motion for Clarification. Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 8/16/2018. (Oliver, T.)
|
|
Filing
22
INITIAL REVIEW ORDER Discovery due by 11/5/2016; Dispositive Motions due by 12/4/2016 Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 5/6/2016. (Buttrick, A.)
|
|
Filing
7
INITIAL REVIEW ORDER. Discovery due by 11/02/2015; Dispositive Motions due by 12/02/2015. Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 4/06/2014. (Pannu, C.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
