Friedman v. Bloomberg LP et al
Dan Friedman |
Bloomberg LP, Christopher Dolmetsch, Erik Larsen, Michael Hytha, Andrew Dunn, Milltown Partners, Patrick Harversen, D.J. Collins, Oliver Rickman, Palladyne International Asset Management B.V., Ismael Abudher and Lily Yeo |
3:2015cv00443 |
March 26, 2015 |
US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
New Haven Office |
New London |
Alvin W. Thompson |
Assault Libel & Slander |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 265 ORDER: For the reasons set forth in the attached order, Defendants' Motion to Compel Payment of Sanctions in Compliance with Court Order (ECF No. 234 ) is hereby GRANTED. (1) On or before August 12, 2022, the plaintiff shall pay the defendants $42,971.00 in good funds and file a notice by that date confirming that such payment has been made. (2) The defendants' request for reimbursement of attorney's fees and costs incurred in bringing the instant motion is granted, and they shall file an application for attorney's fees by September 7, 2022. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Alvin W. Thompson on 07/22/2022. (Ghinaglia Socorro, F.) |
Filing 261 ORDER: For the reasons set forth in the attached order, Defendants' Motion for Leave to File Amended Answer and Counterclaim (ECF No. 250 ) is hereby DENIED. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Alvin W. Thompson on 04/04/2022. (Ghinaglia Socorro, F.) |
Filing 258 ORDER: For the reasons set forth in the attached order:(1) Pursuant to D. Conn. Civ. R. 16(g)(2), the court strikes the plaintiff's objection to the defendants' motion to compel (ECF No. 245 ) and the plaintiff's motion to m odify or vacate (ECF No. 249 ).(2) Pursuant to D. Conn. Civ. R. 16(g)(2), until a notice is filed that the sanctions entered in Friedman v. SThree plc., No. 3:14-cv-378, aff'd, Friedman v. Radujko, 854 Fed. App 39;x 390 (2d Cir. 2021), have been paid in full, Dan Friedman is prohibited from filing any pleadings or other documents in any case in this court, except for such a notice. The court will strike any prohibited filings made by Dan Friedman. (3) Pursuant to D. Conn. Civ. R. 16(g)(2), until a notice is filed that the sanctions entered in Friedman v. SThree plc., No. 3:14-cv-378, aff'd, Friedman v. Radujko, 854 Fed. App'x 390 (2d Cir. 2021), have been paid in full, Alan H. Kaufman is prohibited from filing any pleadings or other documents in any case in this court, except for such a notice. The court will strike any prohibited filings made by Alan H. Kaufman.(4) Pursuant to D. Conn. Civ. R. 16( g)(2), until a notice is filed that the sanctions entered in Friedman v. SThree plc., No. 3:14-cv-378, aff'd, Friedman v. Radujko, 854 Fed. App'x 390 (2d Cir. 2021), have been paid in full, Alan H. Kaufman is barred from appearing as an attorney in any matter in this court except for this case.It is so ordered.Signed by Judge Alvin W. Thompson on 03/03/2022. (Ghinaglia Socorro, F.) |
Filing 184 ORDER: As per the attached order, the Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Rule 72 Objection Nunc Pro Tunc (ECF No. 166-1) is hereby DENIED. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Alvin W. Thompson on 9/14/2020. (Brambila, N.) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.