Anderson v. Rehmer et al
Plaintiff: Francis Anderson
Defendant: Patricia Rehmer, Helene Vartelas, Scott Semple and Anne Cournoyer
Case Number: 3:2015cv00542
Filed: April 13, 2015
Court: US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Office: New Haven Office
County: Tolland
Presiding Judge: Victor A. Bolden
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 18, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 120 ORDER DISMISSING CASE and finding as moot 57 Motion to Dismiss, 78 Motion to Amend, 83 Motion for Order, 86 Motion to Compel, and 90 Motion to Stay. Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 04/18/2016. (LaPre, E.)
November 2, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 68 AMENDED ORDER correcting typographical errors in the Court's 65 Order, and denying with prejudice 9 , 11 , 14 , 16 , 31 , 40 , 44 , 50 , 51 , and 64 motions for preliminary injunctive relief; provisionally granting 42 and 43 Motion to Compel Physical and Mental Health Examination; finding as moot 62 Motion to Consolidate; granting 56 Motion to Seal; and denying 63 Motion to Compel. Signed by Victor A. Bolden on 11/02/2015.
October 30, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 65 ORDER denying with prejudice 9 , 11 , 14 , 16 , 31 , 40 , 44 , 50 , 51 , and 64 motions for preliminary injunctive relief; provisionally granting 42 and 44 Motion to Compel Physical and Mental Health Evaluation; finding as moot 62 Motion to Consolidate; granting 56 Motion to Seal; and denying 63 Motion to Compel. Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 10/30/2015.
August 24, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDER denying without prejudice 23 Motion to Compel, 24 Motion for Summary Judgment, and 25 Motion for Default. Finding as moot 26 , 27 , and 28 Motions to Add Exhibits. Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 08/24/2015. (LaPre, E.)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Anderson v. Rehmer et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Francis Anderson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Patricia Rehmer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Helene Vartelas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Scott Semple
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Anne Cournoyer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?