Fair v. Esserman

Fair v. Esserman

Plaintiff:	Barbara Fair
Defendant:	Dean Esserman
Case Number:	3:2015cv00681
Filed:	May 6, 2015
Court:	US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Office:	New Haven Office
County:	New Haven
Presiding Judge:	Stefan R. Underhill
Nature of Suit:	Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
July 12, 2017	Filing 61 ORDER denying in substantial part 51 Motion for Summary Judgment. Esserman's motion for summary judgment is denied in substantial part. His motion for summary judgment on Fair's claims of direct and retaliatory violations of her First Amendment rights is denied. Fair's claim for injunctive relief against Esserman in his personal capacity is dismissed and the claim for such relief against his official capacity will proceed, but the current Chief of Police should be subst ituted for Esserman pursuant to Rule 25(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Within one week of this Order, the parties shall jointly contact the court to schedule a calendar call in order to set trial dates in this matter.Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 7/12/2017. (Buttrick, A.)
November 23, 2015	Filing 25 ORDER denying 12 Motion to Dismiss; treating 16 as making a motion for judical notice, and granting in part and denying in part that motion. Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 11/23/2015. (Buttrick, A.)

Date Filed

Document Text

July 12, 2017

Filing 61 ORDER denying in substantial part 51 Motion for Summary Judgment. Esserman's motion for summary judgment is denied in substantial part. His motion for summary judgment on Fair's claims of direct and retaliatory violations of her First Amendment rights is denied. Fair's claim for injunctive relief against Esserman in his personal capacity is dismissed and the claim for such relief against his official capacity will proceed, but the current Chief of Police should be subst ituted for Esserman pursuant to Rule 25(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Within one week of this Order, the parties shall jointly contact the court to schedule a calendar call in order to set trial dates in this matter.Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 7/12/2017. (Buttrick, A.)

November 23, 2015

Filing 25 ORDER denying 12 Motion to Dismiss; treating 16 as making a motion for judical notice, and granting in part and denying in part that motion. Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 11/23/2015. (Buttrick, A.)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Fair v. Esserman
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Barbara Fair
Represented By:	Norman A. Pattis
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Dean Esserman
Represented By:	Alyssa Torres
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?