Russ McCullough et al v. World Wrestling Entertainment Inc
Russ McCullough, Ryan Sakoda and Matthew Robert Wiese |
World Wrestling Entertainment, Inc |
Evan Singleton, Vito Lograsso and William Albert Haynes, III |
Robert Windham, Thomas Billington, James Ware, Oreal Perras and John Doe's |
3:2015cv01074 |
July 13, 2015 |
US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
New Haven Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Vanessa L. Bryant |
Other Personal Injury |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 466 ORDER. For the reasons stated in the attached ruling, the Court DENIES the motion to alter and/or for relief from judgment (Doc. # 458 ). It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 11/24/2021. (Gilles, E.) |
Filing 457 ORDER ADOPTING RECOMMENDED RULING. For the reasons stated in the attached ruling, the Court adopts the recommended ruling (Doc. # 453 ) and GRANTS in part defendants' motions for sanctions (Docs. # 378 , # 386 ) in the amount of $312,143.55. Consistent with the recommended ruling, the Court DENIES as moot plaintiffs' motion to strike (Doc. # 451 ).It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 09/30/2021. (Gilles, E.) |
Filing 383 ORDER granting Defendants' Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings 205 and Motions to Dismiss 266 and 269 and granting in part and denying in part Defendants' Motion for Sanctions 262 . Signed by Judge Vanessa L. Bryant on 9/17/2018. (Lindberg, Christina) |
Filing 374 ORDER granting 330 Motion for Summary Judgment to Plaintiffs Singleton and LoGrasso. Signed by Judge Vanessa L. Bryant on 03/28/2018. (Shafer, J.) |
Filing 362 ORDER re: 205 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, 262 Motion for Sanctions, 266 Motion to Dismiss, and 269 Motion to Dismiss; ORDER denying as moot 228 Motion for Sanctions and 291 Motion to Stay; and ORDER denying 326 Motion to Strike and 327 Motion to Strike for the reasons stated in the attached ruling on WWE's Motions to Dismiss, for Sanctions, and for Judgment on the Pleadings. Signed by Judge Vanessa L. Bryant on 9/29/2017. (Hoffman, S) |
Filing 314 ORDER denying without prejudice 188 Motion for Summary Judgment. See attached for memorandum of decision. Signed by Judge Vanessa L. Bryant on 3/24/2017. (Hoffman, S) |
Filing 253 ORDER (1) denying 80 Motion for Sanctions; (2) granting 103 Motion to Dismiss; and (3) granting 104 Motion to Dismiss. The Frazier (3:15-cv-1229) and James (3:15-cv-1305) actions are hereby dismissed. See attached memorandum of opinion. Signed by Judge Vanessa L. Bryant on 11/10/2016. (Hoffman, S) |
Filing 185 ORDER denying 118 Motion for Reconsideration of the Court's Order with respect to Singleton and LoGrasso; granting 119 Motion for Reconsideration of the Court's Order with respect to Windham, et al. See attached Memorandum of Opinion. For the reasons stated in the attached Opinion, the Courts Order at Docket Number 117 dismissing the Windham action is VACATED. Signed by Judge Vanessa L. Bryant on 7/21/16. (Shechter, N.) |
Filing 116 ORDER granting in part and denying in part Defendant's 43 Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint brought by Plaintiffs Singleton and LoGrasso; granting Defendant's 64 Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint of Plaintiff Haynes; denying as moot Defendant's 64 Motion to Dismiss the Haynes Complaint for Lack of Jurisdiction; granting Defendant's 95 Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint of Plaintiffs McCullough, Sakoda and Weise. See attached memorandum of opinion. Signed by Judge Vanessa L. Bryant on 3/21/16. (Shechter, N.) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.