Brown et al v. Dirga et al
Franklin Brown and Karen Rogala |
Fredrick Dirga, Del Mauro, John Doe et al and Middletown Police Dept. |
3:2015cv01086 |
July 15, 2015 |
US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
New Haven Office |
Hartford |
Janet C. Hall |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 123 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 111 Motion for Summary Judgment. Dirga's Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED as to the Fourth Amendment investigatory stop and search and seizure claims and DENIED as to the Fourth Amendment excessive force claim. The case will proceed only as to the Fourth Amendment excessive force claim against Dirga. Signed by Judge Dominic J. Squatrito on 9/29/17. (Glynn, T.) |
Filing 108 RULING denying 104 MOTION for Voluntary Dismissal, MOTION for Hearing. Signed by Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam on 11/10/2016. (Kaczmarek, S.) |
Filing 63 MEMORANDUM OF CONFERENCE and RULING ON MOTIONS: Denying 26 MOTION to Appoint Counsel with leave to renew; denying 45 MOTION for Mental Examination of Plaintiff; denying 46 MOTION to Appoint Expert Witness; denying 47 MOTION for Extension of Time to Prepare Case for Trial; granting in part and denying in part 48 MOTION to Compel Discovery; and denying 58 MOTION for Extension of Time to prepare for trial and find counsel. See attached Memorandum of Conference and Ruling on Motions for further details. Signed by Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam on 5/11/2016. (Kaczmarek, S.) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.