Kolpinski v. Rushford Center, Inc
Plaintiff: Michael Kolpinski
Defendant: Rushford Center, Inc
Case Number: 3:2015cv01267
Filed: August 24, 2015
Court: US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Office: New Haven Office
County: New Haven
Presiding Judge: Stefan R. Underhill
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 18, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 31 ORDER granting 21 Motion to Remand to State Court. The Clerk shall effect the remand and close the file. Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 7/18/2016. (Landman, M)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kolpinski v. Rushford Center, Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael Kolpinski
Represented By: Christine L. Gertsch
Represented By: Ryan A O'Neill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rushford Center, Inc
Represented By: Lori B. Alexander
Represented By: Elizabeth R. McKenna
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?