Torres v. McGrath et al
| Candido Torres |
| Robert McGrath, James Brown, Jaclyn Osden, Kim Lacasse, McFarland and Department of Corrections |
| 3:2015cv01558 |
| October 26, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| New Haven Office |
| Fairfield |
| Vanessa L. Bryant |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
31
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 29 Motion to Dismiss by Defendant Osden. Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claim shall proceed against Defendant Osden; Plaintiff's First Amendment claim and claims for injunctive relief are dismissed as to Defendant Osden for the reasons set forth in the Ruling attached. Signed by Judge Vanessa L. Bryant on 7/31/2017. (Hudson, C)
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER granting 19 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. Claims against Defendants Lacasse, McFarland, and McGrath are dismissed for the reasons set forth in the Decision attached. Signed by Judge Vanessa L. Bryant on 1/9/2017. (Hudson, C)
|
|
Filing
9
INITIAL REVIEW ORDER: The Complaint is dismissed in part and may go forward on the claims described in the attached Order. Discovery due by 12/2/2016 Dispositive Motions due by 1/1/2017. The Clerk is directed to mail a copy of this Order to the Plaintiff. Signed by Judge Vanessa L. Bryant on 5/3/2016.(Nadler, S.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
