Conquistador v. Hartford Police Department et al
| Jean K. Conquistador |
| Hartford Police Department, Brian Foley, Suarez, City of Hartford, John Doe and Flores |
| 3:2015cv01618 |
| November 9, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| New Haven Office |
| Hartford |
| Sarah A. L. Merriam |
| Charles S. Haight |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
94
ORDER. The 86 Motion to Amend/Correct the Complaint is GRANTED. However, the 87 Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint is also GRANTED. For the reasons stated in the attached order, the plaintiff's amended complaint failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. The amended complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice. The case will remain closed. Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 11/8/2017. (Mac Dougall, S.)
|
|
Filing
84
ORDER. For the reasons stated above, Defendants' 60 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. The claims against the Hartford Police Department are DISMISSED with prejudice. The claims against the City of Hartford and the defendant Officers are DISMISSED without prejudice. In light of the plaintiff's pro se status, the Court will give the plaintiff one more chance to amend his complaint to properly state a claim in accordance with the Court's ruling. Should plaintiff wish to do so, he may file an amended complaint that set forth the basis for the Court's jurisdiction and sufficient facts, accepted as true, that state a claim for relief by April 13, 2017.Plaintiff's 48 Motion to Compel, 51 Motion for Conference, [ 62] Motion to Compel, 64 Motion to Compel, 65 Motion to Appoint Counsel, 70 Motion to Compel, 73 Motion to Amend/Correct, 78 Motion to Compel, and 80 Motion for Default Judgment are DENIED as moot. The Clerk is directed to close the case. Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 3/13/2017. (Connelly, L.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
