Markey v. Green Tree Servicing, LLC et al
| Janice B. Markey |
| Green Tree Services, LLC and Federal Mortgage Services |
| 3:2015cv01711 |
| November 20, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| New Haven Office |
| Fairfield |
| Michael P. Shea |
| Other Contract |
| No cause code entered |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
31
ORDER. The Motion 21 to Dismiss is GRANTED as to Counts One and Two and DENIED as to Count Three. The Motion 2 for Temporary Restraining Order and/or Preliminary Injunction is DENIED. Markey may choose, if she wishes, to re-plead her brea ch of contract and breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing claims in an amended complaint that addresses the defects discussed herein, consistent with Fed. R. Civ. P. 11. Otherwise, she may simply proceed on the alternative promissory e stoppel claim. Markey is granted leave to file any amended complaint within 21 days of this ruling; if no amended complaint is filed within that time, the case will continue as to the promissory estoppel claim only. Should Markey choose to amend her complaint and should Defendants then file a new motion to dismiss, Defendants may incorporate by reference any prior briefing. Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 9/22/16. (Tegeler, D.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
