Edelson et al v. Chapel Haven, Inc. et al
| Shereen Edelson and Arnold Menchel |
| Chapel Haven, Inc., Michael Storz, Department of Developmental Services, Morna A. Murray, Department of Social Services and Roderick L. Bremby |
| 3:2015cv01862 |
| December 22, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| New Haven Office |
| New Haven |
| Stefan R. Underhill |
| Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
63
ORDER denying as moot 25 Motion to Dismiss; denying as moot 26 Motion to Dismiss; granting in part and denying in part 32 Motion to Dismiss; granting in part and denying in part 34 Motion to Dismiss. The motions to dismiss all of the claims asserted by the plaintiff-parents on their own behalf are granted without prejudice to amending within thirty days of this Order. With respect to the State defendants, their motions to dismiss Count Two (violation of the integrati on mandate); Count Four (violation of the free choice and fair hearing provisions); and Count Five (violation of due process) are granted. Their motions to dismiss Count One (violation of the ADA and Rehabilitation Act anti-discrimination provisions) and Count Three (violation of the ADA and Rehabilitation Act retaliation provisions) are denied.With respect to the Chapel Haven defendants, their motions to dismiss a portion of Count One (violation of the anti-discrimination provision in T itle II of the ADA); Count Two (violation of the integration mandate); Count Four (violation of free choice and fair hearing provisions); Count Five (violation of due process); Count Eight (promissory estoppel); Count Nine (specific performance as a separately pleaded cause of action); Count Ten (breach of fiduciary duty); Count Twelve (income-based discrimination in violation of section 46a-64); Count Thirteen (intentional infliction of emotional distress); and Count Fifteen (CUTPA) are granted . Their motion to dismiss Count Fourteen (negligent infliction of emotional distress) is denied. Thus, either because they survived both motions to dismiss or because they were not challenged, the following counts remain: against the State de fendants, Counts One and Three; and against the Chapel Haven defendants, Count One (under Title III), and Counts Three, Six, Seven, Eleven, and Fourteen. The parent-plaintiffs are also ordered to inform the court within thirty days of this Order whic h parent will be the "primary" decision-maker on Robert's behalf in the context of this case. The parties are also ordered to provide a proposed scheduling order governing discovery and the filing of summary judgment motions to the court within thirty days of this Order.Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 3/1/2017. (Buttrick, A.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
