Szydlo v. USA
Plaintiff: Regina Szydlo
Defendant: USA
Case Number: 3:2016cv00127
Filed: January 28, 2016
Court: US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Office: New Haven Office
County: New London
Presiding Judge: Vanessa L. Bryant
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1346
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 12, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 43 ORDER denying 27 and 28 Motions to Dismiss for the reasons set forth in the Memorandum of Decision attached. This action will proceed on all claims asserted in the Amended Complaint 31 and Third-Party Complaint 21 . Signed by Judge Vanessa L. Bryant on 1/12/2017. (Hudson, C)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Szydlo v. USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Regina Szydlo
Represented By: Kara M. Burgarella
Represented By: Dale P. Faulkner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?