Estate of Lashano Gilbert v. New London Police Department et al
| Estate of Lashano Gilbert |
| New London Police Department, Lawrence & Memorial Hospital, Inc, City of New London, Deidre Cronin-Vorih, Patricia Tidd, Melissa Schafranski-Broadbent, Scott Johnson, Kristy Christina, Kurt Lavimoniere, Doreen Coe, Richard Cable, Wayne Neff, Christopher Bunkley and Chris White |
| 3:2016cv00241 |
| February 16, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| New Haven Office |
| New London |
| Michael P. Shea |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
164
ORDER. For the reasons stated in the attached document, Defendant Dr. Deirdre Cronin-Vorih's 131 motion for summary judgment is DENIED. Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 12/17/2018. (Guevremont, Nathan)
|
|
Filing
126
ORDER. For the foregoing reasons, Defendant Lawrence & Memorial Hospital, Inc.'s motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 100) is hereby GRANTED. The Police Defendants' motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 103) is hereby GRANTED IN PART AND D ENIED IN PART. It is granted with respect to all of the plaintiffs' claims against the Police Defendants besides the excessive force claim, which will proceed to trial save as to Officers Tidd and Christina and the City of New London. Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 9/25/2018. (Self, A.)
|
|
Filing
71
ORDER. For the reasons set forth herein, the motions to dismiss asserting lack of subject matter jurisdiction and lack of an adequate medical opinion letter (ECF Nos. 26 , 57 , 58 , 62 , 63 , 64 ) are DENIED. The Hospital Defendants' motio n to dismiss regarding liability (ECF No. 29 ) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part: the case against Lawrence and Memorial Hospital may proceed on a theory of vicarious, not direct, liability, and the case against Lawrence and Memorial Corporation is dismissed. The motions to sever (ECF Nos. 39 , 40 ) are also DENIED. The denial of the motions to sever is without prejudice with regard to severing the trial. The parties should continue with joint discovery. Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 2/21/17. (Tegeler, D.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
