Jansson v. Stamford Health, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Samantha Jansson
Defendant: Stamford Health, Inc., Stamford Hospital, Stamford Anesthesiology Services, P.C., VantagePoint, LLC, Michael Coady, Sharon Kiely, Sal Mancino and Theresa Bowling
Case Number: 3:2016cv00260
Filed: February 17, 2016
Court: US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Office: New Haven Office
County: Fairfield
Presiding Judge: Charles S. Haight
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 24, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 250 RULING (see attached) denying 23 Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on May 24, 2018. (Dorais, L.)
May 7, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 235 RULING (see attached) provisionally granting 190 Plaintiff's Motion to Compel and Request for In Camera Inspection. On or before June 1, 2018, Defendants Stamford Hospital and Stamford Anesthesiology Services, P.C. may, i f so advised, submit additional papers in support of a claim that certain particular documents forming the subject matter of the motion are protected by an evidentiary privilege. (See discussion in attached Ruling re: requisite showings to cl aim attorney-client and work product privileges and to prove "joint defense agreement"). If such additional submissions are made, setting forth a show of privilege as to each document at issue, the Court will enter a further schedul ing order for the submission of responsive papers by Plaintiff. If Defendants do not file such additional papers by June 1, the Court's provisional granting of Plaintiff's motion to compel will become absolute, and Defendants will be required to produce the documents in question to Plaintiff at that time. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on May 7, 2018. (Dorais, L.)
April 11, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 213 RULING (see attached) granting 211 Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration. Plaintiff must file her Revised Amended Complaint in conformance with this Ruling on or before April 27, 2018. Upon filing of that revised pleading, the Clerk is instructed to reinstate VantagePoint as a defendant on the case docket in this action.Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on April 11, 2018. (Dorais, L.)
March 30, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 210 RULING (see attached) granting in part and denying in part 150 Plaintiff's Third Motion to Amend Complaint. Plaintiff must file a final "Revised Amended Complaint," consistent with the terms of this Ruling on or befor e Friday, April 27, 2018. The period for amendment of the pleadings is hereby CLOSED as of the entry of this Ruling. On or before Friday, May 11, 2018, the parties must meet and/or confer and file a joint amended Rule 26(f) Report, refl ecting the state of present discovery and proposing any revised case deadlines they believe are necessary in light of this Ruling. The Clerk is directed to terminate the following defendants immediately: VantagePoint, LLC and Sharon Kiely. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on March 30, 2018. (Dorais, L.)
April 5, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 138 RULING (see attached) GRANTING in part and DENYING in part 59 Plaintiff's Second Motion to Amend Complaint. Plaintiff may file her proposed "Amended Complaint," consistent with the terms of this Ruling, on or before Friday, April 28, 2017. The Court also DENIES (without prejudice to reinstatement) Defendants' 25 26 Motions to Dismiss, which addressed the prior Complaint, and the parties' discovery motions [Doc. 66 , 92 , 98 , 99 , 106 , 122 , 128 , 131 , 134 , 135 , and 137 ] for the same reason. The parties may each file an omnibus motion containing all outstanding discovery concerns and/or issues to be decided in a hearing the Court will then schedule on all discovery mat ters in this case. [The parties' 136 Joint Motion for Status Conference, or in the Alternative, A Referral of Pending Discovery Motions to Magistrate Judge is thus DENIED as moot at this time.] On or before Friday, May 12, 2017, the parties are directed to file a joint amended Rule 26(f) Report, reflecting the state of present discovery and proposing any revised case deadlines they believe are necessary in light of this Ruling. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on April 5, 2017. (Dorais, L.)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jansson v. Stamford Health, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Stamford Health, Inc.
Represented By: Michael J. Soltis
Represented By: Justin E. Theriault
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Stamford Hospital
Represented By: Michael J. Soltis
Represented By: Justin E. Theriault
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Stamford Anesthesiology Services, P.C.
Represented By: Thomas E. Brennan
Represented By: Thomas P. Lambert
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: VantagePoint, LLC
Represented By: Rosemarie Barretta
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael Coady
Represented By: Michael J. Soltis
Represented By: Justin E. Theriault
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sharon Kiely
Represented By: Michael J. Soltis
Represented By: Justin E. Theriault
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sal Mancino
Represented By: Michael J. Soltis
Represented By: Justin E. Theriault
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Theresa Bowling
Represented By: Thomas E. Brennan
Represented By: Thomas P. Lambert
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Samantha Jansson
Represented By: Heena Kapadia
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?