Doe v. Smereczynsky et al
Plaintiff: Jane Doe
Defendant: Joshua Smereczynsky, Dean M. Esserman, John Doe and City of New Haven
Case Number: 3:2016cv00394
Filed: March 8, 2016
Court: US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Office: New Haven Office
County: New Haven
Presiding Judge: Michael P. Shea
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 6, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 61 ORDER. For the reasons set forth in the attached, Officer Smereczynsky's motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 53) is hereby GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. The motion is denied with respect to Ms. Doe's excessive force and intentional infliction of emotional distress claims. It is granted with respect to all of Ms. Doe's other claims. As noted in the Court's scheduling order (ECF No. 24), the parties' joint trial memorandum will be due thirty (30) days fro m the date of this ruling. Further, jury selection in this case is scheduled for December 5th, 2018 at 9:00 A.M; the pretrial conference is scheduled for November 19, 2018, at 2:00 P.M.; and a telephonic status conference is scheduled in this case f or Monday, October 29th, 2018 at 3:30 P.M. Finally, should the parties wish to proceed to mediation, they should file within fourteen (14) days the joint statement described at the undersigned's page of the Court's website. Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 9/6/2018. (Self, A.)
March 23, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 44 ORDER. For the reasons set forth in the attached, the Court GRANTS Defendants New Haven's and Esserman's 28 motion to dismiss. As all the claims against Defendants New Haven and Esserman have been dismissed, the Clerk is directed to terminate Defendants New Haven and Esserman from the case. Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 3/23/2017. (Howard, H.)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Doe v. Smereczynsky et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jane Doe
Represented By: Heather E Rolfes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Joshua Smereczynsky
Represented By: Christopher A. Clark
Represented By: Thomas R. Gerarde
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dean M. Esserman
Represented By: Michael A. Wolak, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of New Haven
Represented By: Michael A. Wolak, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?