DeAngelis v. Cowels et al
| Jeffery DeAngelis |
| Cowels, Property Supervisor and Michelle King |
| 3:2016cv00472 |
| March 21, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| New Haven Office |
| New London |
| Michael P. Shea |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
7
ORDER. (1) The claims in the Complaint 1 are DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1). The court will permit the plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint with regard to his First Amendment claims provided (1) he can assert facts to s how that the defendants substantially burdened his religious beliefs when Officer Cowels confiscated his chain and cross and did not return them when officials transferred him to Osborn, three days later, and (2) he can assert detailed allegations to support his retaliation claim. The amended complaint may also replead his Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment claims as long as it includes factual allegations showing why presentation of his claim to the Claims Commission would be an inadequate remedy. Any amended complaint must be filed within thirty days of the date of this order.(2) If the plaintiff chooses not to file an amended complaint within the time specified, the Clerk is directed to enter judgment for the defendants and close this case. Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 8/18/16. (Tegeler, D.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
