Laura Laaman & Associates, LLC v. Davis

Justia Dockets & Filings Second Circuit Connecticut District Court Laura Laaman & Associates, LLC v. Davis

Laura Laaman & Associates, LLC v. Davis

Plaintiff:	Laura Laaman & Associates, LLC
Defendant:	Lori Davis
Case Number:	3:2016cv00594
Filed:	April 15, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Office:	New Haven Office
County:	Fairfield
Presiding Judge:	Michael P. Shea
Nature of Suit:	Trademark
Cause of Action:	15 U.S.C. § 1125
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
August 7, 2019	Filing 117 ORDER. For the reasons set forth in the attached, the following documents may remain under seal: the Laura Laaman Declaration (ECF No. 55-1), the Craig Laaman Declaration (ECF No. 55-2), the Sean M. Tuttle Declaration (ECF No. 55-3), the Conrad S. K ee Declaration (ECF No 55-4), Exhibit G to the parties' joint trial memorandum (ECF No. 79), and Exhibit 4 to Plaintiff's Opposition of Defendant's Motion in Limine (ECF No. 97).Laaman is directed to refile Exhibit G to the par ties' joint trial memorandum (ECF No. 79) with pages 4-5 and 34 unredacted within 21 days. If no revised document is filed before the deadline, the Clerk will be directed to unseal Exhibit G (ECF No. 79).The Clerk is directed to seal the Expert Report of Susan Briggs (ECF No. 48-2).Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 8/7/2019. (Karpman, Michael)
November 27, 2017	Filing 57 ORDER. For the reasons set forth in the attached, the 48 motion for summary judgment is hereby DENIED. Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 11/27/2017. (Self, A.)

Date Filed

Document Text

August 7, 2019

Filing 117 ORDER. For the reasons set forth in the attached, the following documents may remain under seal: the Laura Laaman Declaration (ECF No. 55-1), the Craig Laaman Declaration (ECF No. 55-2), the Sean M. Tuttle Declaration (ECF No. 55-3), the Conrad S. K ee Declaration (ECF No 55-4), Exhibit G to the parties' joint trial memorandum (ECF No. 79), and Exhibit 4 to Plaintiff's Opposition of Defendant's Motion in Limine (ECF No. 97).Laaman is directed to refile Exhibit G to the par ties' joint trial memorandum (ECF No. 79) with pages 4-5 and 34 unredacted within 21 days. If no revised document is filed before the deadline, the Clerk will be directed to unseal Exhibit G (ECF No. 79).The Clerk is directed to seal the Expert Report of Susan Briggs (ECF No. 48-2).Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 8/7/2019. (Karpman, Michael)

November 27, 2017

Filing 57 ORDER. For the reasons set forth in the attached, the 48 motion for summary judgment is hereby DENIED. Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 11/27/2017. (Self, A.)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Laura Laaman & Associates, LLC v. Davis
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Laura Laaman & Associates, LLC
Represented By:	Conrad S. Kee
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Lori Davis
Represented By:	Eric M. Desmond
Represented By:	David A. Ryan, Jr.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?