The Few, The Proud, The Forgotten et al v. United States Department of Veterans Affairs
The Few, The Proud, The Forgotten, Vietnam Veterans of America and Connecticut State Council of Vietnam Veterans of America |
United States Department of Veterans Affairs |
3:2016cv00647 |
April 27, 2016 |
US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
New Haven Office |
New Haven |
Victor A. Bolden |
Freedom of Information Act |
05 U.S.C. ยง 552 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 152 ORDER denying 147 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 147 Motion for Contempt. Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 08/14/19. (Ryan, Sarah) |
Filing 64 ORDER. Having conducted a hearing regarding outstanding discovery on January 31, 2018, and upon further consideration, the Court orders the following: (1) Plaintiffs will submit additional search terms to the Defendant by February 7, 2018; (2) separa tely, the parties will file a status report with the Court on February 14, 2018; and (3) the parties and representatives from the Department of Veterans Affairs would return to Court for a follow-up hearing on Monday, February 26, 2018 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 2 of the Brien McMahon Federal Building, 915 Lafayette Blvd., Bridgeport, CT. Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 2/1/2018. (Riegel, J.) |
Filing 39 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 26 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 5/26/2017.(Ghosh, S.) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.