Hutchins v. Camardella et al
| Robert Hutchins |
| Anthony J. Camardella, Joseph E. Camardella, Jeffrey Stempien, Michal Vangroski, Maya Sparks and Barry Butler |
| 3:2016cv00999 |
| June 20, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| New Haven Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Jeffrey A. Meyer |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
44
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO DISMISS. For the reasons stated in the attached order, the Court GRANTS the motions to dismiss (Docs. # 22 and # 25 ). The complaint is dismissed with prejudice as to defendants Maya Sparks and Barry Butler pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) on the ground that they are not state actors subject to suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction as to the state law claims against them. See 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c) (3); Lundy v. Catholic Health Sys. of Long Island Inc., 711 F.3d 106, 117-18 (2d Cir. 2013). The complaint is dismissed with prejudice as to the remaining defendants, including Brown, Stempien, and Vongroski, pursuant to Rules 12(b)(2) and 12(b)(5) due to insufficient service of process and Rule 8 due to prolixity. The Clerk of Court shall close this case. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 12/29/2017. (Zuckier, C.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
