Jackson v. Farinella
Plaintiff: Kevin Jackson
Defendant: Monica Farinella
Case Number: 3:2016cv01174
Filed: July 13, 2016
Court: US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Office: New Haven Office
County: Hartford
Presiding Judge: Jeffrey A. Meyer
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 25, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 35 RULING GRANTING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. For the reasons stated in the attached ruling, defendant's motion for summary judgment (Doc. # 28 ) is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court shall close this case. Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 1/25/2018. (Black, R.)
November 28, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 9 INITIAL REVIEW ORDER. For the reasons set forth in the attached Order, the Court enters the following orders:(1) The claims against defendant for monetary damages in her official capacity are DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2). The Eighth Amendment claim shall proceed against defendant in her individual capacity and in her official capacity to the extent that plaintiff seeks declaratory and injunctive relief.(2) Within twenty-one (21) days of this Order, the U.S. Marshals Service shall serve the summons, a copy of the complaint and this order on defendant in her official capacity by delivering the necessary documents in person to the Office of the Attorney General, 55 Elm Street, Hartford, CT 06141. (3) Within twenty-one (21) days of this Order, the Clerk shall ascertain from the Department of Correction Office of Legal Affairs the current work address for defendant and mail a waiver of service of process request packet to her at her curr ent work address. On the thirty-fifth (35th) day after mailing, the Clerk shall report to the court on the status of all the requests. If defendant fails to return the waiver request, the Clerk shall make arrangements for in-person service by the U.S . Marshals Service and defendant shall be required to pay the costs of such service in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(d).(4) Defendant shall file her response to the complaint, either an answer or motion to dismiss, within s ixty (60) days from the date the notice of lawsuit and waiver of service of summons forms are mailed to her. If she chooses to file an answer, she shall admit or deny the allegations and respond to the cognizable claims recited above. She may als o include any and all additional defenses permitted by the Federal Rules.(5) Discovery, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26 through 37, shall be completed within six months (180 days) from the date of this order. Discovery requests need not be filed with the court.(6) All motions for summary judgment shall be filed within seven months (210 days) from the date of this order.It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 11/28/2016. (Gruber, Sarah)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jackson v. Farinella
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kevin Jackson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Monica Farinella
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?