Rogers v. Salius et al
| John Rogers |
| Scott Salius, Grasso, Barbra LaFrance, Shepard, Damian Doran, Syhed Johar Naqvi, Kimberly Weir and Jesus Guadarrama |
| 3:2016cv01299 |
| August 1, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| New Haven Office |
| Hartford |
| Janet C. Hall |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
30
RULING granting in part and denying in part 25 Motion to Dismiss. The defendants Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 25 ) is GRANTED as to the claim for injunctive relief and DENIED in all other respects. The Clerk is directed to verify defendant Maioran as current work address with the Department of Correction Office of Legal Affairs, mail a waiver of service of summons packet containing the Amended Complaint and this Ruling and Order to defendant Maiorana at that address within twenty-one (21) day s of this Order, and report to the court on the status of the waiver request on the thirty-fifth (35) day after mailing. If defendant Maiorana fails to return the waiver request, the Clerk shall make arrangements for in-person service by the U.S. Marshals Service on her in her individual capacity and the defendant shall be required to pay the costs of such service in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(d).. Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 4/12/2017. (Lewis, D)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
