Demers et al v. Enfield et al
| Daniel Demers and Edith Mandujano-Demers |
| Town of Enfield, Carl Sferrazza, Kevin Ragion, James Laurino, Vanessa Magagnoli, John Doe and Jane Doe |
| 3:2016cv01354 |
| August 10, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| New Haven Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Janet Bond Arterton |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
43
ORDER: For the reasons set forth in the attached Order, Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 32 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is granted as to Counts Four, Five, Six, and Nine, denied as to Counts One, Two, Three, and Eight, and denied without prejudice as to Count Seven. The parties are directed to file a joint status report within seven days providing a proposed scheduling order for remaining Monell discovery and summary judgment briefing on the Monell claim. The Court will conduct a telephonic status conference on Tuesday, 8/21/18 at 10:00 A.M. Defendants shall initiate the call to chambers' conference line: 203-773-2737. Signed by Judge Janet Bond Arterton on 8/10/2018. (Kolker, J.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
