Ravalese v. East Hartford et al
| Harry Ravalese |
| Town of East Hartford, Scott Sansom, Kate Weaver, Joseph Ficacelli, John Doe and Jane Doe |
| 3:2016cv01642 |
| September 30, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| New Haven Office |
| Hartford |
| Victor A. Bolden |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
90
RULING AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 80 Motion for Summary Judgment.For the reasons explained in the attached Ruling and Order, Defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. The Court gr ants summary judgment to Defendants as to the following of Plaintiff's claims: (1) all claims against Jane Doe; (2) the claim for malicious prosecution under 42 U.S.C. § 1983; (3) the claim of false arrest under 42 U.S.C. § 1983; (4) t he Monell claim against East Hartford and Chief Sansom; (5) the official capacity claims against Officer Weaver, John Doe, and Chief Sansom, which are duplicative of the Monell claim; (6) the claims of negligence arising from the officers' inves tigation and arrest of Plaintiff only; (7) the claim of intentional infliction of emotional distress arising from the officers' investigation and arrest only; (8) the claim of negligent infliction of emotional distress arising from the officers& #039; investigation and arrest only; (9) the claim of recklessness arising from the officers' investigation and arrest only; (10) the claims under Article I, §§ 8 and 20 of the Connecticut Constitution; and (11) the claims of municipal liability under CONN. GEN. STAT. § 52-557n that are based on the claims of negligence arising from the officers' investigation and arrest only. The Court denies Defendants' motion with respect to the following claims: (1) the claim of municipal liability under CONN. GEN. STAT. § 52-557n, based on the claim of negligence arising from the officers' use of excessive force; and (2) the claim of indemnification under CONN. GEN. STAT. § 7-465, based on the claim of ne gligence arising from the officers' use of excessive force. The Court reserves decision as to summary judgment on all remaining claims against John Doe, following a properly-filed motion to amend the Complaint and any subsequent briefing. As stated in the attached Ruling and Order, that motion must be filed no later than June 28, 2019. Because the Court has granted summary judgment on all claims against Jane Doe, she is dismissed as a defendant in this case. See attached Ruling and Order for full details. Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 6/14/2019. (Baran, Hugh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
