Powell v. Jones-Soderman et al
| Scott Powell |
| Jill Jones-Soderman and Foundation for the Child Victims of the Family Courts |
| 3:2016cv01653 |
| October 3, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| New Haven Office |
| Fairfield |
| Alvin W. Thompson |
| Assault, Libel, and Slander |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
104
RULING denying the defendant's 91 Motion for Judgment on Partial Findings. Judgment shall enter in favor of the plaintiff in the amount of $100,000. The Clerk is directed to close this case. Signed by Judge Robert M. Spector on 1/14/2020. (Watson, M.)
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER. For the reasons stated in the attached, Powell has alleged facts sufficient to plead his claims of defamation per se, invasion of privacy, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and negligent infliction of emotional distress. Jones-Sodermans motion for judgment on the pleadings, (ECF No. 39), is therefore DENIED. Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 4/15/2019. (Guevremont, Nathan)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER: The defendants' motion to quash proof of service (Doc. No. 11 ) is hereby GRANTED in part and DENIED in part for the reasons set forth in the attached document. The motion is being granted as to defendant Foundation for the Child Victims of the Family Courts and denied as to defendant Jill Jones-Soderman. Signed by Judge Alvin W. Thompson on 8/24/17. (Mata, E.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
