Shailer-Solak v. Colvin

Shailer-Solak v. Colvin

Plaintiff:	Elizabeth Ann Shailer-Solak
Defendant:	Carolyn W. Colvin
Case Number:	3:2016cv01681
Filed:	October 7, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Office:	New Haven Office
County:	Hartford
Presiding Judge:	Janet C. Hall
Presiding Judge:	Joan G. Margolis
Nature of Suit:	Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 0405
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 20, 2019	Filing 30 RULING AND ORDER granting 23 Motion to Reverse the Decision of the Commissioner; denying 27 Motion to Affirm the Decision of the Commissioner: For the reasons explained in the attached Ruling and Order, the motion to reverse the decision of the A cting Commissioner is GRANTED and the motion to affirm the decision of the Acting Commissioner is DENIED. The Acting Commissioner's Decision is VACATED and REMANDED for the calculation and payment of benefits. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to enter judgment for Ms. Shailer-Solak, remand this case to the Acting Commissioner for calculation and payment of benefits, and close this case. Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 3/20/2019. (Baran, Hugh)
March 19, 2019	Filing 29 ORDER TO AMEND CASE CAPTION: For the reasons explained in the attached Order, the Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to amend the docket and case caption to reflect that Nancy A. Berryhill, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, is now the named Defendant in this action. Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 3/19/2019. (Baran, Hugh)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 20, 2019

Filing 30 RULING AND ORDER granting 23 Motion to Reverse the Decision of the Commissioner; denying 27 Motion to Affirm the Decision of the Commissioner: For the reasons explained in the attached Ruling and Order, the motion to reverse the decision of the A cting Commissioner is GRANTED and the motion to affirm the decision of the Acting Commissioner is DENIED. The Acting Commissioner's Decision is VACATED and REMANDED for the calculation and payment of benefits. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to enter judgment for Ms. Shailer-Solak, remand this case to the Acting Commissioner for calculation and payment of benefits, and close this case. Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 3/20/2019. (Baran, Hugh)

March 19, 2019

Filing 29 ORDER TO AMEND CASE CAPTION: For the reasons explained in the attached Order, the Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to amend the docket and case caption to reflect that Nancy A. Berryhill, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, is now the named Defendant in this action. Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 3/19/2019. (Baran, Hugh)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Shailer-Solak v. Colvin
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Elizabeth Ann Shailer-Solak
Represented By:	Dennis G. Ciccarillo
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?