Paschal v. Santili

Plaintiff: Deja L. Paschal
Defendant: Santili
Case Number: 3:2016cv01690
Filed: October 13, 2016
Court: Connecticut District Court
Office: New Haven Office
County: Fairfield
Presiding Judge: Janet C. Hall
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
July 6, 2017 43 Opinion or Order of the Court RULING denying 21 The Motion to Amend to Add Relief; denying 22 Motion for Protective Order; denying 23 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying without prejudice to refiling at a later stage of litigation 31 Motion to Appoint Counsel ; grant ing 33 Motion to Amend the Motion for Summary Judgment. The Clerk shall docket a copy of the Motion to Amend (Doc. No. 33) as a Memorandum and Local Rule 56(a)1 Statement in support of the Motion for SummaryJudgment (Doc. No. 23). Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 7/6/2017. (Anastasio, F.)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Paschal v. Santili
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Deja L. Paschal
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Santili
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?