Oquendo v. Corrections et al
| Vilma Oquendo |
| Other Agents, Department of Corrections, John Does, Jane Does and Perez |
| 3:2016cv01709 |
| October 14, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| New Haven Office |
| Hartford |
| Michael P. Shea |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
45
ORDER. For the reasons stated in the attached, the 33 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Any claims Oquendo brought in her individual capacity, any claims against the DOC or against the individual defendants in their official capacities, any Monell claims, any claims of negligence as a basis for wrongful death, and any claims of mere negligence as a basis for liability under Section 1983 for Eighth or Fourteenth Amendment violations are DISMISSED. Oquendo's cl aims as administratrix of Rivera's estate will proceed on the remaining theories of liability against the defendants in their individual capacities. The discovery deadline in this case is June 1, 2018. Dispositive motions are due on or before July 1, 2018. The Joint Trial Memorandum is due August 1, 2018 or 30 days from the Court's ruling on dispositive motions if any are filed. Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 2/27/2018. (Mac Dougall, S.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
