England v. Amica Mutual Ins Co
Plaintiff: Cecily I. England
Defendant: Amica Mutual Ins Co
Case Number: 3:2016cv01951
Filed: November 29, 2016
Court: US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Office: New Haven Office
County: Tolland
Presiding Judge: Michael P. Shea
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 11, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER. For the reasons set forth in the attached, Defendant's 9 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. The case is dismissed. The Clerk is directed to close the case. Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 9/11/2017. (Taykhman, N.)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: England v. Amica Mutual Ins Co
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Amica Mutual Ins Co
Represented By: Anthony J Antonellis
Represented By: John Anthony Donovan, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cecily I. England
Represented By: Brian D. Danforth
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?