USA v. Espinar
Petitioner: USA
Respondent: Johnathan Espinar
Case Number: 3:2016mc00212
Filed: July 20, 2016
Court: US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Office: New Haven Office
County: Hartford
Presiding Judge: Alvin W. Thompson
Nature of Suit: Other
Cause of Action: Petition to Enforce IRS Summons
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 4, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER re: Show Cause Hearing. See attached Order for details and deadlines. Signed by Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam on 1/4/2017. (Kaczmarek, S.)
November 1, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ENFORCEMENT ORDER AND JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam on 11/1/2016. (Kaczmarek, S.)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: USA v. Espinar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: USA
Represented By: Natalie Nicole Elicker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Johnathan Espinar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?