Terex South Dakota, Inc. v. Carraro Drive Tech, S.p A.

Justia Dockets & Filings Second Circuit Connecticut District Court Terex South Dakota, Inc. v. Carraro Drive Tech, S.p A.

Terex South Dakota, Inc. v. Carraro Drive Tech, S.p A.

Plaintiff:	Terex South Dakota, Inc.
Defendant:	Carraro Drive Tech, S.p A.
Case Number:	3:2017cv00154
Filed:	February 2, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Office:	New Haven Office
County:	XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge:	Michael P. Shea
Nature of Suit:	Other Contract
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 8, 2018	Filing 42 For the reasons set forth in the attached, Carraro's motion to dismiss (ECF No. 16) is hereby DENIED and Terex's motion to dismiss (ECF No. 24) is hereby GRANTED. As set forth above, Carraro's second, fourth, eighth, ninth, and tenth counts are dismissed without prejudice. Carraro may file an amended counterclaim complaint repleading the dismissed claims within 30 days of the issuance of this order. Carraro may not make further amendments to the counterclaim complaint absent a showing of good cause. Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 3/8/2018. (Self, A.)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 8, 2018

Filing 42 For the reasons set forth in the attached, Carraro's motion to dismiss (ECF No. 16) is hereby DENIED and Terex's motion to dismiss (ECF No. 24) is hereby GRANTED. As set forth above, Carraro's second, fourth, eighth, ninth, and tenth counts are dismissed without prejudice. Carraro may file an amended counterclaim complaint repleading the dismissed claims within 30 days of the issuance of this order. Carraro may not make further amendments to the counterclaim complaint absent a showing of good cause. Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 3/8/2018. (Self, A.)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Terex South Dakota, Inc. v. Carraro Drive Tech, S.p A.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Terex South Dakota, Inc.
Represented By:	Jeff C. Grotta
Represented By:	Cary E. Hiltgen
Represented By:	Kurosh L. Marjani
Represented By:	Zachary John Phillipps
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Carraro Drive Tech, S.p A.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?