Nationstar Mortgage, LLC v. Dadi et al
Nationstar Mortgage LLC |
Ahmed A. Dadi and Secretary of Housing and Urban Development |
Ahmed A. Dadi |
Secretary of Housing and Urban Development |
3:2017cv00165 |
February 6, 2017 |
US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
New Haven Office |
Fairfield |
Victor A. Bolden |
Foreclosure |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1442 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 98 ORDER. For the reasons set forth in the attached, Nationstar's motion for summary judgment as to liability, ECF No. 86 , is GRANTED. Nationstar is directed to file a motion for judgment of foreclosure by sale by April 2, 2020. The mo tion shall include a proposed order providing: (1) a proposed date for the sale of the Property; (2) a proposed committee for the foreclosure; and (3) a proposed schedule for the committees activities prior to the sale.Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 3/2/2020. (Karpman, Michael) |
Filing 81 ORDER. Plaintiff's 49 Motion to Dismiss and Strike Defenses is GRANTED for the reasons stated in the attached. Mr. Dadi may, within 21 days of this order, file an amended RESPA counterclaim that corrects the defects under the attached order. Any such amendment, however, may not assert further claims, as Mr. Dadi has already received an opportunity to amend. Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 8/24/2018. (Barclay, Michael) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.