Doe v. Bruno
| Jane Doe |
| Richard Bruno |
| Domco LLC, Domco II LLC and Kem Bruno |
| 3:2017cv00217 |
| February 14, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| New Haven Office |
| New Haven |
| Joan G. Margolis |
| Jeffrey A. Meyer |
| Other Personal Injury |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
35
ORDER granting 2 Application for Prejudgment Remedy in the amount of $250,000; and granting 3 Motion for Disclosure of Assets. See attached. Signed by Judge Joan G. Margolis on 4/20/2017. (Saffir, Jaclyn)
|
|
Filing
33
Minute Entry. Proceedings held before Judge Joan G. Margolis: taking under advisement 3 Motion for Disclosure; taking under advisement 2 Motion for Prejudgment Remedy; Prejudgment Remedy Hearing held on 4/3/2017. Total time 26 minutes(Court Reporter Falzarano.) (Campbell, A)
|
|
Filing
15
EX PARTE TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. For the reasons set forth in the attached ruling, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Defendant Richard Bruno is temporarily restrained for a period of no more than 14 days from the d ate of this Order from transferring money held in accounts other than any prisoner trust account, or transferring other assets, without prior approval of the Court. 2. Service of this Order, the verified complaint, and other papers filed in this case shall be made on respondent immediately, and not later than Tuesday, February 21, 2017. In light of defendant's incarceration, plaintiff's counsel shall make all efforts to effect service in conformance with this schedule. 3. Plain tiff and defendant Richard Bruno will appear before this Court by telephonic hearing at 12:30 P.M. on Wednesday, March 1, 2017, in Courtroom Three, United States District Court, 141 Church Street, New Haven, Connecticut. At this hearing, defen dant Richard Bruno shall show cause why a temporary restraining order on the terms requested by plaintiff in her motion (Doc. # 4 ) should not be granted until such time as a hearing can be held on the motion for a prejudgment remedy, which shall be referred to Magistrate Judge Joan G. Margolis by way of a separate docket order. In light of defendants incarceration, plaintiff's counsel shall make all efforts to secure defendant's attendance at the hearing on March 1, 2017, by telephone. 4. For good cause, the Court issues this temporary restraining order without requiring plaintiff to give security pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(c). It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 2/16/2017. (Gruber, Sarah)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
