Doe v. Quinnipiac University et al
| John Doe |
| Quinnipiac University, Seann Kalagher and Terri Johnson |
| 3:2017cv00364 |
| March 2, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| New Haven Office |
| New Haven |
| Janet Bond Arterton |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
152
ORDER: For the reasons set forth in the attached Ruling, Plaintiff's 147 Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Evidence is DENIED and Defendants' 81 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The Motion is gran ted with respect to Count Three (Deliberate Indifference under Title IX), Counts Six, Seven, and Eight (all for Tortious Interference), Count Nine (NIED), Count Ten (IIED), and Count Eleven (Negligence). The Motion is denied with respect to Counts On e and Two (Erroneous Outcome and Selective Enforcement Title IX Claims), Count Four (Breach of Contract), Count Five (Breach of the Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing), and Count Twelve (Reckless and Wanton Misconduct). Signed by Judge Janet Bond Arterton on 7/10/19. (Kolker, J.)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER: For the reasons stated in the attached Ruling, Plaintiff's Motion 2 for Preliminary Injunction is DENIED.Signed by Judge Janet Bond Arterton on 3/31/17. (Denker, J.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
