Walker v. Doe et al
| Eugene Lionel Walker |
| Jane Doe, Carson Wright, Ricardo Ruiz and Doe |
| 3:2017cv00425 |
| March 15, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| New Haven Office |
| New London |
| Janet C. Hall |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
53
RULING denying 50 Motion to Amend/Correct. Walkers Motion to Amend Complaint (Doc. No. 50 ) is DENIED. Walkers equal protection claims are DISMISSED pursuant to section 1915A(b)(1) of title 28 of the United States Code and his request for injunctive relief is DENIED as moot. The case will proceed only on the Fourteenth Amendment deliberate indifference claims against Wright and Verville. Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 9/17/2018. (Lewis, D)
|
|
Filing
46
RULING: The defendants Motion to Dismiss and for Judgment on the Pleadings (Doc. No. 39) is GRANTED as to the claims against Nurse Savoie, Nurse Lawrence, Nurse Burke, and Nurse Wilson, and DENIED as to the claims against Dr. Wright and Nurse Vervill e. Any claims for injunctive relief are also dismissed. The case will proceed on the Fourteenth Amendment deliberate indifference claims against Dr. Wright and Nurse Verville. The case also will proceed on Walkers equal protection claim, which was not addressed in defendants Motion. Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 5/15/2018. (Anastasio, F.) Modified text on 5/15/2018 (Anastasio, F.).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
