Gilead Community Services, Inc. et al v. Cromwell et al
| Gilead Community Services, Inc., Rainbow Housing Corp. and Connecticut Fair Housing Center, Inc. |
| Town of Cromwell, Enzo Faienza, Anthony Salvatore and Jillian Massey |
| 3:2017cv00627 |
| April 17, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| New Haven Office |
| Middlesex |
| Victor A. Bolden |
| Housing/Accommodations |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 3601 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
281
ORDER denying 249 Motion for Judgment; denying 254 Motion to Stay; granting 255 Motion for Nominal Damages. For the reasons described in the attached ruling, the 249 Motion for Judgment is DENIED, the 254 Motion to Stay is DENIED, and the 255 Motion for Nominal Damages is GRANTED.Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 5/27/2022. (Castano, Nelson)
|
|
Filing
138
ORDER denying 75 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 76 Motion for Summary Judgment; and denying 110 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 12/20/2019. (Leon, Noel)
|
|
Filing
118
ORDER: Document 117 , which ruled on 75 Motion for Summary Judgment, 76 Motion for Summary Judgment, and 110 Motion for Summary Judgment, contained a technical error and is replaced by the attached ruling. Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 9/30/2019. (Leon, Noel)
|
|
Filing
98
ORDER granting 57 Motion to Amend/Correct. Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 02/26/19. (Ryan, Sarah)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
