Marchand v. Horvack
Plaintiff: Gregg Marchand
Defendant: John Horvack
Case Number: 3:2017cv00638
Filed: April 17, 2017
Court: US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Office: New Haven Office
County: Windham
Presiding Judge: Michael P. Shea
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: No cause code entered
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 24, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER. For the reasons set forth in the attached, I dismiss this case without prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(h)(3). The (ECF No. 2) motion to proceed in forma pauperis and the (ECF No. 5) motion to amend the complaint are hereby DENIED as moot. Accordingly, the Clerk is instructed to close this case. Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 5/24/2017. (Howard, H.)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Marchand v. Horvack
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gregg Marchand
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Horvack
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?