Carolina v. Connecticut
| Tyrone D. Carolina |
| State of Connecticut |
| 3:2017cv00754 |
| May 8, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| New Haven Office |
| New London |
| Stefan R. Underhill |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
57
RULING. For the reasons set forth in the attached Ruling, petitioner's Second Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. # 23 ) is DENIED. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam on 7/12/2022. (McCallum, C.)
|
|
Filing
50
ORDER denying 31 Motion to Dismiss without prejudice. Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 08/27/2021. (Powell, G.)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER denying 22 Motion to Appoint Counsel; denying as moot 22 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; denying 24 Motion to Amend/Correct; denying 25 Motion for Order. Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 5/1/2020. (Smith, E)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER denying 15 Motion to Appoint Counsel; denying 16 Motion for Order; denying 17 Motion to Appoint Counsel; denying 18 Motion to Compel; denying 19 Motion for Final Judgment. The court will permit Carolina one more opportunity to fi le an amended petition for writ of habeas corpus on a court form. The amended petition must be filed within twenty (20) days of the date of this order and clearly and concisely state each ground for relief and the facts in support each ground. In a ddition, Carolina must indicate whether he exhausted each ground by raising it on direct appeal or in a state habeas petition or other collateral proceeding in state court in the spaces provided on the form and either attach copies of any state court decisions or include case citations to any state court decisions. The Clerk is directed to send the petitioner a copy of this order and an Amended Section 2254 Habeas Corpus Petition form. Signed by Judge Stefan R Underhill on 9/19/2019. (Smith, E)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER DISMISSING CASE without prejudice. Carolina may move to reopen the case no more than 30 days after he fully exhausts his available state court remedies with respect to all grounds he seeks to raise in this action. The motion to reopen mu st be accompanied by an amended petition for writ of habeas corpus, which must (i) state all grounds on which Carolina seeks relief, (ii) attach copies of any state court decisions documenting the exhaustion of those grounds, and (iii) comply with Lo cal Rule 8(b) and Rule 2(c) of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts. The Clerk shall enter a judgment of dismissal without prejudice, terminate all pending motions, and close the case. Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 01/03/2018. (Jamieson, K)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Carolina v. Connecticut | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Tyrone D. Carolina | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: State of Connecticut | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
