Tisdale v. Berryhill
Ms. Larcenia Tisdale |
Acting Commissioner Nancy A. Berryhill |
3:2017cv00979 |
June 13, 2017 |
US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
New Haven Office |
New Haven |
Janet C. Hall |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 13, 2017. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Nancy A. Berryhill ( Filing fee $400 receipt number 0205-4434311.), filed by Larcenia Tisdale. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Civil Cover sheet)(Spat, Meryl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Tisdale v. Berryhill | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Acting Commissioner Nancy A. Berryhill | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Ms. Larcenia Tisdale | |
Represented By: | Meryl Anne Spat |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.