Amica Mutual Ins Co v. Williams

Amica Mutual Ins Co v. Williams

Plaintiff:	Amica Mutual Ins Co
Defendant:	Shirley Williams
Case Number:	3:2017cv01043
Filed:	June 23, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Office:	New Haven Office
County:	XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge:	Victor A. Bolden
Nature of Suit:	Insurance
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2201
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
June 19, 2020	Filing 122 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 83 Motion in Limine; denying 91 Motion in Limine; denying 92 Motion in Limine; granting 93 Motion in Limine; granting 94 Motion in Limine; granting 95 Motion in Limine for the reasons state d in the attached ruling.As to Mr. Coan's motion, the following evidence will be excluded: any evidence of drugs or alcohol at the Property, the names and conduct of any witnesses to the fire, and the cause of the fire. The following evi dence, however, will be permitted: evidence arguably probative of Ms. Williams's financial situation and motivations regarding her representations about the rental unit's value.As to Amica's motions, evidence of Amica's ap plication of depreciation will not be categorically excluded at this time, while evidence of Mr. Kopchyak's personal circumstances will be allowed, to the extent they may have distracted him and caused errors in his reporting. The following evid ence, however, will be excluded: evidence of subrogation, any inadvertent disclosures covered by attorney-client privilege, and evidence about Amica's insurance reserves. The Court's ruling, however, is "subject to change when the case unfolds, particularly if the actual testimony differs from what was [expected]."Luce v. United States, 469 U.S. 38, 41 (1984). Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 6/19/2020. (Conde, Djenab)

Date Filed

Document Text

June 19, 2020

Filing 122 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 83 Motion in Limine; denying 91 Motion in Limine; denying 92 Motion in Limine; granting 93 Motion in Limine; granting 94 Motion in Limine; granting 95 Motion in Limine for the reasons state d in the attached ruling.As to Mr. Coan's motion, the following evidence will be excluded: any evidence of drugs or alcohol at the Property, the names and conduct of any witnesses to the fire, and the cause of the fire. The following evi dence, however, will be permitted: evidence arguably probative of Ms. Williams's financial situation and motivations regarding her representations about the rental unit's value.As to Amica's motions, evidence of Amica's ap plication of depreciation will not be categorically excluded at this time, while evidence of Mr. Kopchyak's personal circumstances will be allowed, to the extent they may have distracted him and caused errors in his reporting. The following evid ence, however, will be excluded: evidence of subrogation, any inadvertent disclosures covered by attorney-client privilege, and evidence about Amica's insurance reserves. The Court's ruling, however, is "subject to change when the case unfolds, particularly if the actual testimony differs from what was [expected]."Luce v. United States, 469 U.S. 38, 41 (1984). Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 6/19/2020. (Conde, Djenab)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Amica Mutual Ins Co v. Williams
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Amica Mutual Ins Co
Represented By:	Michael Joseph Maxey
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Shirley Williams
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?