Chernosky v. Amica Mutual Ins. Co
Plaintiff: Gail M. Chernosky
Defendant: Amica Mutual Ins. Co
Case Number: 3:2017cv01047
Filed: June 26, 2017
Court: US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Office: New Haven Office
County: Windham
Presiding Judge: Vanessa L. Bryant
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 24, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER granting 12 Motion to Dismiss for the reasons set forth in the Memorandum of Decision attached. The Clerk's office is directed to close this file. Signed by Judge Vanessa L. Bryant on 1/24/2018. (Hudson, C)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Chernosky v. Amica Mutual Ins. Co
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Amica Mutual Ins. Co
Represented By: Anthony J Antonellis
Represented By: John McCormack
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gail M. Chernosky
Represented By: Brian D. Danforth
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?