Groomes v. Frazir et al
| Bobby Groomes |
| Frazir, Wagner, N. Lewis, Antonio Santiago and David Maiga |
| 3:2017cv01072 |
| June 28, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| New Haven Office |
| Hartford |
| Janet C. Hall |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
22
RULING granting 18 Motion for Summary Judgment. The Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 18 ), filed by Wagner, Frazir, Lewis, and Santiago, is GRANTED as to Groomes Fourteenth Amendment equal protection claim, and the Clerk is directed to close the case. Alternatively, the court would have dismissed the claim pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to comply with court orders and a rule of the court. Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 12/10/2018. (Lewis, D)
|
|
Filing
17
RULING AND ORDER denying 11 Motion for Reconsideration. The Letter (Doc. No. 11 ), which has been docketed as a Motion for Reconsideration, is DENIED in all respects. Groomes is on notice that he is required by the Standing Order (Doc. No. 4 ) to file any document in this case using the Prisoner E-Filing Program at the facility in which he is confined. In addition, any further requests for relief should be filed in the form of a properly captioned motion (Lewis, D)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
