Ramey v. Geoffrey

Ramey v. Geoffrey

Plaintiff:	Philip Ramey
Defendant:	Morgan Geoffrey
Case Number:	3:2017cv01086
Filed:	June 29, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Office:	New Haven Office
County:	New Haven
Presiding Judge:	Jeffrey A. Meyer
Nature of Suit:	Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 17, 2018	Filing 38 ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS. For the reasons set forth in the attached ruling, Morgan's motion for judgment on the pleadings (Doc. # 27 ) is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court shall close this case.Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 9/17/2018. (Gondwe, N.)
November 7, 2017	Filing 20 ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT. For the reasons stated in the attached ruling, the motion for more definite statement (Doc. # 13 ) is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint by November 21, 2017, that describes the general content or substance of the statements that plaintiff believes were protected speech and the basis for retaliation by defendant. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 11/7/2017. (Black, R.)

Date Filed

Document Text

September 17, 2018

Filing 38 ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS. For the reasons set forth in the attached ruling, Morgan's motion for judgment on the pleadings (Doc. # 27 ) is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court shall close this case.Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 9/17/2018. (Gondwe, N.)

November 7, 2017

Filing 20 ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT. For the reasons stated in the attached ruling, the motion for more definite statement (Doc. # 13 ) is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint by November 21, 2017, that describes the general content or substance of the statements that plaintiff believes were protected speech and the basis for retaliation by defendant. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 11/7/2017. (Black, R.)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ramey v. Geoffrey
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Morgan Geoffrey
Represented By:	Robin B. Kallor
Represented By:	Michael J. Rose
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Philip Ramey
Represented By:	John R. Williams
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?