Firetree, Ltd. et al v. Norwalk et al
| Firetree, Ltd., John Doe and Jane Doe |
| City of Norwalk and Aline Rochefort |
| 3:2017cv01088 |
| June 30, 2017 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| New Haven Office |
| Fairfield |
| Michael P. Shea |
| Housing/Accommodations |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 3601 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
177
ORDER: As discussed in today's telephonic conference, the Court will hold a hearing Monday, 12/23/19 at 10:00 a.m. to consider the parties' proposed settlement in accordance with Conn. Gen. Stat. § 8-8(n). At the hearing, the Court w ill ask the parties briefly to describe the negotiations leading up to the settlement, the various consideration involved, and the monetary compensation to be paid in connection with the withdrawal of the zoning appeal. During the call, the parties pointed out that if this appeal were in Connecticut state court, it would be governed by Practice Book § 14-7B, which would require no notice or hearing other than this notice and the hearing to be held before the Court on Monday. Spec ifically, under that provision, the City's zoning board would not be required to give notice or hold a hearing because the settlement contemplates no modification of the zoning decision being challenged; under the proposed settlement, that decis ion will stand and the appeal will be withdrawn. Although this Practice Book provision is not binding on this Court, I see no reason not to follow it in this case in light of the information concerning the proposed settlement the parties have provid ed to the Court, which is attached hereto. So I decline to order any notice of the settlement other than this notice or any hearing on the settlement other than the one to be held before the Court on Monday. Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 12/19/19. (Constantine, A.)
|
|
Filing
122
ORDER: The 114 motion to introduce evidence in addition to the contents of the return of record is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as set forth in the attached. Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 8/13/2019. (Ram, Megha)
|
|
Filing
76
ORDER. For the reasons set forth in the attached, the 48 motion to dismiss is hereby DENIED. Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 9/14/2018. (Self, A.)
|
|
Filing
41
ORDER. Based on a review of the parties' 40 26(f) report, the Court orders the deadlines set forth in the attached. Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 10/18/2017. (Self, A.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
