Nymbus, Inc. v. Sharp

Nymbus, Inc. v. Sharp

Plaintiff:	Nymbus, Inc.
Defendant:	Scott Sharp
Case Number:	3:2017cv01113
Filed:	July 5, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Office:	New Haven Office
County:	XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge:	Jeffrey A. Meyer
Nature of Suit:	Other Contract
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
February 19, 2019	Filing 104 RULING RE MOTION FOR PARTIAL JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS AND MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT. For the reasons set forth in the attached ruling, Sharp's motion for judgment on the pleadings (Doc. # 66 ) as to Nymbus's claims for breach of contract and breach of fiduciary duty is DENIED, and Sharp's motion for partial summary judgment (Doc. # 56 ) on the issues of his non-exemption under the FLSA and his 'good reason' for terminating his employment is GRANTED.Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 2/19/2019. (Sokoloff-Rubin, E.)
February 5, 2018	Filing 32 ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS AND MOTION TO TRANSFER. For the reasons set forth in the attached ruling, defendants motion to dismiss this case pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(2) and 12(b)(3) is DENIED. Defendant's motion to transfer this case to the Northern District of Texas pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404 or an exception to the first-filed rule is DENIED. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 2/5/2018. (Lombard, N.)

Date Filed

Document Text

February 19, 2019

Filing 104 RULING RE MOTION FOR PARTIAL JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS AND MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT. For the reasons set forth in the attached ruling, Sharp's motion for judgment on the pleadings (Doc. # 66 ) as to Nymbus's claims for breach of contract and breach of fiduciary duty is DENIED, and Sharp's motion for partial summary judgment (Doc. # 56 ) on the issues of his non-exemption under the FLSA and his 'good reason' for terminating his employment is GRANTED.Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 2/19/2019. (Sokoloff-Rubin, E.)

February 5, 2018

Filing 32 ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS AND MOTION TO TRANSFER. For the reasons set forth in the attached ruling, defendants motion to dismiss this case pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(2) and 12(b)(3) is DENIED. Defendant's motion to transfer this case to the Northern District of Texas pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404 or an exception to the first-filed rule is DENIED. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 2/5/2018. (Lombard, N.)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Nymbus, Inc. v. Sharp
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nymbus, Inc.
Represented By:	Kathleen Elizabeth Dion
Represented By:	John Higgins Kane
Represented By:	Alexandra L. Sobol
Represented By:	Scott L. Vernick
Represented By:	John A. Wait
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Scott Sharp
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?