Fairy-Mart, LLC et al v. Marathon Petroleum Company LP et al
| Fairy-Mart, LLC, G.S.P.C., Inc. and Michael Olsen |
| Marathon Petroleum Company LP and Petroleum Marketing Group, Inc. |
| 3:2017cv01195 |
| July 18, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| New Haven Office |
| New London |
| Michael P. Shea |
| Franchise |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
51
ORDER. For the reasons stated in the attached, the plaintiffs' [13, 28] motion for a preliminary injunction is GRANTED. The transactions between Marathon and PMG for the plaintiffs' Norwich, Southington, and Waterford, Connecticut, stations are ENJOINED pending a final determination on the merits of the plaintiffs' claims. Because the parties have not briefed the issue of what security the Court should require the plaintiffs to post to pay any damages sustained by the defe ndants if they are found to have been wrongfully enjoined, the Court STAYS this order for 14 days. Within that 14-day period, the parties shall confer and shall either (1) file a joint statement setting forth their joint or respective positions as to the proper amount of a bond or other security, or (2) failing that, file separate motions with respect to the posting of security. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(c). Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 11/6/2017. (Mac Dougall, S.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
