Fairy-Mart, LLC et al v. Marathon Petroleum Company LP et al
Plaintiff: Fairy-Mart, LLC, G.S.P.C., Inc. and Michael Olsen
Defendant: Marathon Petroleum Company LP and Petroleum Marketing Group, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2017cv01195
Filed: July 18, 2017
Court: US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Office: New Haven Office
County: New London
Presiding Judge: Michael P. Shea
Nature of Suit: Franchise
Cause of Action: 28:1332
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 6, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 51 ORDER. For the reasons stated in the attached, the plaintiffs' [13, 28] motion for a preliminary injunction is GRANTED. The transactions between Marathon and PMG for the plaintiffs' Norwich, Southington, and Waterford, Connecticut, stations are ENJOINED pending a final determination on the merits of the plaintiffs' claims. Because the parties have not briefed the issue of what security the Court should require the plaintiffs to post to pay any damages sustained by the defe ndants if they are found to have been wrongfully enjoined, the Court STAYS this order for 14 days. Within that 14-day period, the parties shall confer and shall either (1) file a joint statement setting forth their joint or respective positions as to the proper amount of a bond or other security, or (2) failing that, file separate motions with respect to the posting of security. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(c). Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 11/6/2017. (Mac Dougall, S.)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Fairy-Mart, LLC et al v. Marathon Petroleum Company LP et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Fairy-Mart, LLC
Represented By: William S. Fish, Jr.
Represented By: Thomas J. Pagliarini
Represented By: Lisa A. Zaccardelli
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: G.S.P.C., Inc.
Represented By: William S. Fish, Jr.
Represented By: Thomas J. Pagliarini
Represented By: Lisa A. Zaccardelli
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael Olsen
Represented By: William S. Fish, Jr.
Represented By: Thomas J. Pagliarini
Represented By: Lisa A. Zaccardelli
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Marathon Petroleum Company LP
Represented By: Patrick M. Fahey
Represented By: Karen T. Staib
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Petroleum Marketing Group, Inc.
Represented By: Patrick M. Fahey
Represented By: Karen T. Staib
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?