Hackman v. East Hartford et al
Shameka Hackman |
Town of East Hartford, East Hartford Police Department, Scott Sansom, Peter Vanek, Thomas Castagna, Ian Allison, Nicholas Palladino, Jeffrey Cutler, Michael Romano, Rebecca Wise, John Doe and Jane Doe |
3:2017cv01344 |
August 9, 2017 |
US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
New Haven Office |
Hartford |
Jeffrey A. Meyer |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 54 ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS AND RE PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT. For the reasons stated in the attached, the Court GRANTS the motion of the individual defendants Thomas Castagna, Nicholas Palladino, Peter Vanek, and Rebe cca Wise for judgment on the pleadings (Doc. # 44 ). The Clerk of Court shall dismiss these parties as defendants in this case. The Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part plaintiff Shakema Hackmans motion to file an amended complaint (Doc. # 48 ). T he motion to amend is denied as to the individual defendants and the East Hartford Police Department but granted as to the Town of East Hartford. Hackman may file an amended complaint against the Town of East Hartford by September 18, 2019. In accord ance with the Courts prior order granting an extension of time for the filing of dispositive motions (Doc. # 53 ), the parties may file any additional dispositive motions by September 27, 2019. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 08/28/2019. (Mahler-Haug, A) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.