| October 4, 2022 |
Filing
486
ORDER granting plaintiffs' 470 Motion to Compel and denying defendant's 474 Motion for Protective Order and to Quash Subpoena in part with prejudice and in part without prejudice. Defendant's compliance is due by October 5, 2022 at 12:00 p.m. Plaintiffs' duplicative 469 Sealed Motion is denied as moot. Signed by Judge S. Dave Vatti on 10/4/2022. (Nichols, Jeffrey)
|
| February 28, 2022 |
Filing
420
ORDER. For the reasons set forth in detail on the record in a discovery conference/hearing conducted on February 22, 2022, and for those reasons set forth in hearings, of which there are transcripts docketed, conducted on June 24, 2021 (ECF N o. 344 ), July 7, 2021 (ECF No. 334 ), October 25, 2021 (ECF No. 381 ) and January 27, 2022 (ECF No. 407 ), which are incorporated by reference, Plaintiff's Motion to Compel, ECF No. 307 , is GRANTED in part and DENIED in p art. The Cour's standard of review, findings and conclusions are summarized in the attached Order. Defendant shall produce the designated categories of documents ordered to be produced by the Court by April 25, 2022. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge S. Dave Vatti on 2/28/2022. (Arroyo, Alexandra)
|
| February 4, 2022 |
Filing
408
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 323 Motion for Summary Judgment. The Court GRANTS the motion for summary judgment on the plaintiffs' CUTPA claim (Count Six) to the extent of liability for sales occurring before August 15, 2014. The Court DENIES the motion for summary judgment in all other respects. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 2/4/22. (Brooks, E.)
|
| August 12, 2020 |
Filing
274
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Doc. # 219 ). For the reasons set forth in the attached opinion, the Court GRANTS the motion for summary judgment (Doc. # 219 ) as to Count VIII (Rhode Island Deceptive Trade Practices Act claim) and DENIES the motion for summary judgment as to all other claims. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 8/12/2020. (Al-Jarani, Y.)
|
| March 28, 2019 |
Filing
179
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS. For the reasons set forth in the attached ruling, defendant's motion to dismiss (Doc. # 164 ) is GRANTED in part as to plaintiffs' Vermont law claims but DENIED as to all other claims. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 3/28/2019. (Sokoloff-Rubin, E.)
|
| May 18, 2018 |
Filing
142
AMENDED ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS. For the reasons stated in the attached ruling, Nestle's motion to dismiss (Doc. # 53 ) is GRANTED, and the following complaints are dismissed: Patane v. Nestle Waters North America, In c., 3:17-cv-01381, Krinsky v. Nestle Waters North America, Inc., 3:17-cv-01474, Lilly v. Nestle Waters North America, Inc., 17-cv-01566, and Brown v. Nestle Waters North America, Inc., 3:17-cv-01746. This ruling is without prejudice to plaintiffs' filing of amended complaints within 30 days that state any proper claims not preempted by federal law. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 5/18/2018. (Zuckier, C.) Modified on 5/18/2018 (Gutierrez, Y.).
|
| May 17, 2018 |
Filing
141
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS. For the reasons stated in the attached ruling, Nestle's motion to dismiss (Doc. # 53 ) is GRANTED, and the following complaints are dismissed: Patane v. Nestle Waters North America, Inc., 3:17-cv-01381, Krinsky v. Nestle Waters North America, Inc., 3:17-cv-01474, Lilly v. Nestle Waters North America, Inc., 17-cv-01566, and Brown v. Nestle Waters North America, Inc., 3:17-cv-01746. This ruling is without prejudice to plaintiffs' filing of amended complaints within 30 days that state any proper claims not preempted by federal law. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 5/17/2018. (Zuckier, C.)
|