Johnson v. New Haven et al
| Bobby Johnson |
| City of New Haven, Francisco Ortiz, Clarence Willoughby, Michael Quinn, Patrick Redding, Herman Badger and Andrew Muro |
| 3:2017cv01479 |
| September 1, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| New Haven Office |
| New Haven |
| Jeffrey A. Meyer |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
213
NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION AND ORDER. On October 22, 2019, the Court held a telephone conference with all counsel concerning this case. As explained during the teleconference and as set forth in the accompanying notice of disqualification, the Court has decided to recuse himself from this action. The Clerk of Court shall place this case in the wheel for random assignment to another district judge in the District of Connecticut. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 10/23/2019. (Mahler-Haug, A)
|
|
Filing
157
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO AMEND COMPLAINT. For the reasons stated in the accompanying ruling, plaintiff's motion for leave to file a Second Amended Complaint (Doc. # 138 ) is GRANTED in part as to Count 6 and DENIED in part as to the addition of New Haven Police Department Sergeant Christopher Mahon as a defendant. It is so ordered.Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 3/12/2019. (Rubin, N.)
|
|
Filing
109
ORDER ON DISCOVERY DISPUTE. For the reasons set forth in the attached ruling, defendants' objection to plaintiff's first request is OVERRULED. Defendants' objection to plaintiff's second request is OVERRULED IN PART and SUSTAINED IN PART. Defendants' objection to plaintiff's third request is OVERRULED. Defendants' objection to plaintiff's fourth request is OVERRULED IN PART and SUSTAINED IN PART. Plaintiff's previous motion to compel document producti on (Doc. # 81 ) is DENIED AS MOOT. Defendants shall produce all material on a good faith rolling basis and complete production of documents within the scope of this Order by November 5, 2018. In the event that defendants intend to assert a cla im of privilege as to any document, defendants shall furnish a privilege log to plaintiff by October 5, 2018, to the extent that defendants' counsel has obtained such documents, and promptly thereafter for any subsequently acquired documents. All discovery shall be completed by March 1, 2019. Counsel for the parties shall confer and propose an amended scheduling order with interim deadlines. It is so ordered.Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 09/06/2018. (Rubin, N.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
