Hamlin v. Waterbury et al
Plaintiff: Jerome Hamlin
Defendant: City of Waterbury, McMahon and Stafford
Case Number: 3:2017cv01520
Filed: September 8, 2017
Court: US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Office: New Haven Office
County: Hartford
Presiding Judge: Jeffrey A. Meyer
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 5, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 62 RULING denying 55 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Robert M. Spector on 12/5/2019. (Watson, M.)
October 25, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 8 INITIAL REVIEW ORDER: For the reasons set forth in the attached ruling, the Court enters the following orders:(1) Plaintiff's Fourth Amendment claim for excessive force shall proceed against Officers McMahon and Stafford in their individ ual capacities.(2) Plaintiff's remaining federal law claims against Officers McMahon and Stafford and against the City of Waterbury are DISMISSED without prejudice to plaintiff's filing of an amended complaint within 30 days if he b elieves that there are additional facts that could be alleged in good faith to sustain any of the claims that the Court has dismissed.(3) Plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel (Doc. # 3 ) is DENIED.(4) Within twenty-one ( 21) days of this Order, the Clerk shall mail waiver of service of process request packets to Waterbury Police Officers McMahon and Stafford in their individual capacities at the Waterbury Police Department, 255 East Main Street, Waterbury, CT 06702.< br>(5) Defendants McMahon and Stafford shall file their response to the complaint, either an answer or motion to dismiss, within sixty (60) days from the date the notice of lawsuit and waiver of service of summons forms are mailed to them. If the defendants choose to file an answer, they shall admit or deny the allegations and respond to the cognizable claims recited above. They may also include any and all additional defenses permitted by the Federal Rules.(6) Discovery, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26 through 37, shall be completed within six months (180 days) from the date of this order. Discovery requests need not be filed with the court.(7) Any motions for summary judgment shall be filed within seven months (210 days) from the date of this order.It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 10/25/2017. (Lombard, N.)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hamlin v. Waterbury et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jerome Hamlin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Waterbury
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: McMahon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Stafford
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?